97% murky abysmal mediocrity, 3% brilliance.

22. writer. music lover. existentialist.

twitter

last.fm

goodreads

blogge

jesuisperdu:

Edward Hopper, Night Windows (1928)

jesuisperdu:

Edward Hopper, Night Windows (1928)

(Source: cunty, via majorminus)

baudei:

Violinist Jascha Heifetz playing in Mili’s darkened studio as light attached to his bow traces the bow movement.

baudei:

Violinist Jascha Heifetz playing in Mili’s darkened studio as light attached to his bow traces the bow movement.

(Source: boudei, via majorminus)

(Source: eatsleepdraw, via majorminus)

shemite-eyes:

In French, you don’t really say, “I miss you.” You say, “Tu me manques,” which is closer to, “You are missing from me.” I love that. “You are missing from me.” You are a part of me, you are essential to my being. You are like a limb, or an organ, or blood. I cannot function without you.

(Source: timorleste)

! (Taken with instagram)

! (Taken with instagram)

More reusing. (Taken with instagram)

More reusing. (Taken with instagram)

"Don’t do what you want. Do what you don’t want. Do what you’re trained not to want. Do the things that scare you the most."
Chuck Palahniuk, Invisible Monsters  (quote-book)

(Source: josiemac28713)

philphys:

“The scientist has a lot of experience with ignorance and doubt and uncertainty, and this experience is of very great importance, I think. When a scientist doesn’t know the answer to a problem, he is ignorant. When he has a hunch as to what the result is, he is uncertain. And when he is pretty damn sure of what the result is going to be, he is still in some doubt. We have found it of paramount importance that in order to progress, we must recognize our ignorance and leave room for doubt. Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain. Now, we scientists are used to this, and we take it for granted that it is perfectly consistent to be unsure, that it is possible to live and not know. But I don’t know whether everyone realizes this is true. Our freedom to doubt was born out of a struggle against authority in the early days of science. It was a very deep and strong struggle: permit us to question — to doubt — to not be sure. I think that it is important that we do not forget this struggle and thus perhaps lose what we have gained.”
Richard Feynman, The Value of Science (1955) 

philphys:

“The scientist has a lot of experience with ignorance and doubt and uncertainty, and this experience is of very great importance, I think. When a scientist doesn’t know the answer to a problem, he is ignorant. When he has a hunch as to what the result is, he is uncertain. And when he is pretty damn sure of what the result is going to be, he is still in some doubt. We have found it of paramount importance that in order to progress, we must recognize our ignorance and leave room for doubt. Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain. Now, we scientists are used to this, and we take it for granted that it is perfectly consistent to be unsure, that it is possible to live and not know. But I don’t know whether everyone realizes this is true. Our freedom to doubt was born out of a struggle against authority in the early days of science. It was a very deep and strong struggle: permit us to question — to doubt — to not be sure. I think that it is important that we do not forget this struggle and thus perhaps lose what we have gained.”

Richard Feynman, The Value of Science (1955) 

(via itmightgetloud)

dailyartjournal:

Kitty Sabatier

dailyartjournal:

Kitty Sabatier

(via itmightgetloud)

progress